Hamlet Thesis

critical point Thesis Statement In the draw critical point, William Shakespeare writes of a tragedy in which critical point and Laertes both face the same(p) problem-a murdered fetch. The paths of retaliation that each of them take, par anyel their characters and personalities throughout the play. While hamlet broods over the murder of his spawn for the majority of the play, Laertes takes immediate action, and upon hearing closely the death of his father, he rushes in and is ready to kill Claudius-whom he suspects has killed his father. When they prototypal hear the parole of their fathers death, hamlet and Laertes react in very different ways.When Hamlet hears that Claudius was the one who killed his father, his immediate reaction was grief. This is no surprise, due to the fact that he was still mourning the death of his father, although everyone else had already gotten over it. In fact, most people thought that he was overdoing it ,and Claudius went so far as to tell him that he should get over it, and and so far hath discretion fought with nature that we with wisest sorrow think on him together with remembrance of ourselves (act one, scene two).The way that Hamlet plans his revenge, is more trenchant than the way Laertes plans his. While Hamlet is a more intellectual person, as we squeeze out see from his quick wit and sarcasm, Laertes is more impulsive and acts, thusly thinks as we can see when he says I am the right way killed with mine own treachery (act five, scene two). In such a blank space, had the play non ended the way it did, Hamlet may stir been more successful in avenging his fathers murder because of his responsibility and intellect.Despite the fact that Hamlet procrastinates, Hamlet was smarter in the way he think his revenge because his procrastination was due to his grief and foresight. Although Laertes trait of acting speedily can be admired and gets the job done, in a situation that involves death and vengeance, strate gy and discretion are a must. From the beginning of the play, we can see that Hamlet is an intellectual thinker. Although he believes the skin senses and pronounces that it is an honest ghost (act one, scene five) , he still takes precautions after he promises the ghost that he will take revenge.However, Hamlet is still a little stillnessless of the ghost and therefor decides to feign madness so that he would be able to find out if Claudius was the true killer of his father. Even slice feigning madness Hamlet thinks about the whole process of the madness. irrelevant Laertes, Hamlet is careful not to disclose what the ghost has told him and only imparts to Horatio and Marcellus what happened when they commit on his sword that they would never speak of what they saw from that point on.One of the reasons why Hamlet is such a procrastinator is because he becomes caught up in the details and potential consequences. In the soliloquy of to be or not to be (act three, scene two) Hamle t loses the will to live and ponders whether it is worth it to exist. cod to the fact that Hamlet suffered the death of his father at a young age as well as well as some(prenominal) other hardships, Hamlet contemplates whether Tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against the sea of troubles and by opposing, end them?To die to sleep no more (act three, scene two). However, after that, Hamlet mentions the potential consequences of the unacknowledged after death. Due to the death of his father and his mothers precipitous remarriage which Hamlet does not approve of, Hamlet is well aware of the consequences of his actions and then is hesitant to act rashly. When planning his revenge, Hamlet does not jump to conclusions. When the players come, Hamlet asks them to perform The Mousetrap-a play of a murder similar to that of Hamlets fathers.Hamlet hopes that The plays the affair wherein Ill catch the conscience of the king (act tw o, scene two). Indeed, the plan worked and when Claudius stormed out of the theatre, all of Hamlets suspicions were confirmed. As Hamlet so eloquently noted, What, frightened with false parent? , (act three, scene two) Hamlet was now positive that Claudius was at fault for murdering his father. another(prenominal) thing that slows Hamlet down in his plan of revenge is that he is a religious catholic, and he is very concerned about mortality.Hamlet is panicked that if he kills Claudius, his fathers murderer, his soul will be damned. Hamlet is also scared that if he kills Claudius temporary hookup he is praying, Claudius will go to nirvana and that would not please Hamlet because he said that A villain kills my father, and, for that, I, his sole son, do this same villain send to heaven (act three, scene three). Contrary to Hamlet, Laertes followed the passion in his heart. As soon as he returned from France and heard the news, he invaded the palace, and then asked the questions- th e complete opposite of Hamlet.When Laertes hears that Hamlet killed his father, he expresses intense anger and openly announces his plan to take revenge. In his rage, Laertes yells that Let what comes come, only Ill be revenged most thoroughly for my father (act four, scene five) and makes up his mind to take revenge no exit how or where. When Hamlet heard that his father had been murdered by Claudius, he had already been grieving his fathers death for a while and although the pain was still fresh, his fathers death was old news to him.Therefore, Hamlet was still able to think rationally and plan his revenge in a more intelligent manner. However, when Laertes heard about his fathers murder, he was so grief stricken that he could not think rationally and just followed what his heart told him- to kill Hamlet. Unlike Hamlet, Laertes has no problem to cut his throat i th church (Act four, scene seven). To Laertes, mortality doesnt symbolise alot, as he so bluntly puts it- Conscience a nd grace, to the profoundest pit I dare damnation. (Act four, scene five) Due to his impulsive nature, Laertes tends to be unstable at times.However, Claudius, who suspects Hamlets unusual behavior, joins forces with Laertes to devise a plan to kill Hamlet. This proves a flunk of Laertes- being unable to carry out his plans singlehandedly. Together, they scheme to kill Hamlet and even come up with a backup plan in case the first one does not go as planned. In the end, his plan of development a poisoned sword backfires when Hamlet ends up using the poisoned sword on him. When weighing in the pros and cons of each of their personalities and flaws, Hamlet took the smarter path in avenging his fathers murder.Although both Hamlet and Laertes die at the end of the play, the reason Hamlet kills himself is because he had nothing to live for. Ophelia, the cognise of his life was dead, his father was dead and Claudius had died. Since he had nothing to live for, he chose the option of dea th. On the other hand, Laertes had no choice in the occasion because his plan backfired on him and killed him, as we see at the end. Hamlets patience compensable off because he, Hamlet achieved his goal, and Laertes, the son of a fishmonger, did not.