Dear Editor Dear Editor. Amrozi, the cold blooded slayer who helped to seduceulate the Bali bombing lead be executed (Editorial, Aug 9, 2003), which is the form of penalty that clear grants him exactly what he was hoping for. Some tribe welcomed this sentence, some non - suggesting some other forms of punishment, and some, to my astonishment, ar label for a humanitarian resolution in a brain of forgiveness (Letters, Aug. 9, 2003). A forgiveness..? For the terrorist who didnt show unmatchable shred of forgiveness of compunction? It is like granting them the right to continue that sick wickedness they be committing. One of the important things here to ingathering is not to get affright and do nothing but to view as effective ways and forces to help to lessen this sort of crime. I agree with the editorial that the penalties for terror must deter. In my appeal the death penalty in this case is clearly not a very effective way to serve the law, because Amrozi is o ne of those passel who has no regard for the human life, not thus far his own. It should be considered with much greater mete out if punishment granted is really the right punishment in itself for the particular(prenominal) offender. Unfortunately, this sentence is very likely to be utilise as an excuse for further terror.
This is also very ironic since terrorists a great deal voluntarily choose to die for their conformation. It is a dangerous psychological game which call for to be looked at from different rate of views than any other serious crime. An uneven comparability? - of course its uneven. Peopl e have died. A lot of other people are left ! with physical and emotional scars for the rilievo of their lives. aught can ever change that. No matter what the punishment, the equation will always... If you want to get a full essay, site it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment