Ethical Perspectives Essay

ABSTRACTThis paper give describe the four contrary types of honorable perspectives. We will start by describing my honourable perspective which I found out to be face from my results on the Ethical cognizance Inventory Assessment. We will then evaluate the four types of honourable perspectives. Which embarrass character/ virtuousness, obligation/deontology, results/utilitarianism, and lastly, equity/relativism. Then we will conclude with a brief discussion on issues one is likely to encounter dealing with ethical dilemmas at lingo of America.The four ethical perspectives include character/virtue, obligation/deontology, results/utilitarianism, and equity/relativism thus, making up CORE. These different ethical perspectives aid to explain what drives an individuals decision when face with an ethical dilemma. It is behind for someone to say what they will do when faced with an example of an ethical dilemma however, it is a nonher thing to force that same decision when face d with an actual real- carriage dilemma. By understanding what perspective compels someone to make an ethical decision, it will be easier to make that decision when one really has to.I realize found that my ethical perspective is character/virtue. I was not surprised when I got my results. I have always done my topper to live a emotional state of integrity, which is very measurable to me. The heap in my life would agree. Character is a very, if not the most, important part of a persons make up. Without character you have no solid or pardon foundation. Without character you most likely with not possess strong righteousity naturally. Character is the beginning building block of a successful and dependable person who is dependable and values integrity.Character/VirtueThe properties of a virtue are very different from that of other clean cin one casepts, such as value. Virtues are something that you possess moreover if you coiffe them. Values are what is important to people. I may value honesty, but not always regularize the truth. I idlernot possess the virtue of honesty without telling the truth (Ciulla, 2004). Aristotle once said, Virtues are impregnable habits that we learn from society and our leaders. People must practice virtues while being fully conscious that what they are doing is examplely right. iodin thing close to the Greek concept of virtue (aret), which is also core excellence, is that it does not separate an individuals ethical motive from ones occupational ability. Both Plato and Aristotle used many examples of doctors, musicians, coaches, rulers, etc. to talk about the relationship between clean-living and professional excellence. Aristotle wrote, Every excellence brings to good the thing to which it is the excellence and makes the work of that thing be done well. . . . Therefore, if this is avowedly in every case, the excellence of man also will be the state which makes man good and which makes him do his work well. (Ci ulla, 2004)Obligation/DeontologyDeontological morals or deontology, which means obligation or duty in Greek, is an admittance to ethics that focuses on the right or wrong of actions themselves, as strange to the consequences of those actions. It is sometimes described as duty or obligation establish ethics, because deontologists hope that ethical rules bind you to your duty. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted with consequentiality or teleological ethical theories, according to which the rightness of an action is opinionated by its consequences. Deontologists, such as W. D. Ross, hold that the consequences of an action, such as lying, may make lying the right thing to do (Ross, 2002). Many people rule obligated to do what is right just because of their ethical practices. I tactile sensation that no matter what, you should be ethical in everything that you do.Results/UtilitarianismUtilitarianism is the idea that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to boilers suit utility, that is, its contribution to happiness or pleasure as summed among all persons. It is thus a form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome. Utility has been defined by various people as happiness or pleasure, though preference utilitarians, define it as the delight of preferences. It may be described as a life military position with happiness or pleasure as ultimate importance (Wikipedia 2008).Utilitarianism potbelly be contrasted with deontological ethics (which disregards the consequences of performing an act, when determining its moral worth) and virtue ethics (which focuses on character), as well as with other varieties of consequentialism. Supporters of these opposing views have extensively criticized the utilitarian view though utilitarians have been similarly overcritical of other types of ethical perspective. In general, use of the term utilitarian oftentimes refers to a somew hat narrow economic or pragmatic standpoint (Broad, 1930).Equity/RelativismIn philosophy, moral relativism is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical, or personal circumstances. incorrupt relativists hold that no universal standard exists by which to assess an ethical propositions truth moral subjectivism is in that respectfore the opposite of moral absolutism. Relativistic positions often see moral values as relevant only within certain cultural boundaries (cultural relativism), or in the consideration of individual preferences (moral subjectivism). An extreme relativist position might suggest that judging the moral or ethical judgments or acts of another person or conference has no meaning. Though, most relativists advocate a more limited translation of the theory. In moral relativism, there are no absolute rights and wrongs, only different situat ions (Wikipedia 2008).Some moral relativists hold that a personal and prejudiced moral core lies at the base of individuals moral acts. In this view, man morality reflects social convention, and only personal, subjective morality expresses true authenticity. lesson relativism differs from moral pluralism, which acknowledges the co-existence of opposing ideas and practices but accepts limits to differences, such as when vital gracious needs are violated. Moral relativism, in contrast, grants the possibility of moral judgments that do not accept such limits (Wikipedia 2008).Working in a banking environment, I believe having the ethical perspective of character is very important. Naturally having a moral and ethical character places confidence and trust in my superiors that I will do what is ethically right in every situation. I do not see many issues arising in my organization because depone of America places our Code of Ethics as a priority that from each one associate must abi de by. Understanding character, we see that ethical decisions are made naturally because it is right. I do my best to uphold Bank of Americas code in everything I do.In conclusion, there are many differences to the types of ethical perspectives with few related qualities. Individuals from diverse walks of life and belief systems come to their own ethical perspective conclusion in many different ways. My personal ethics perspective is character. I believe having good character is a vital part of ones life. It will not only lead to success, but earn peoples respect along the way. The admiration of others, and the trust and confidence they will feel from one that has great character is priceless. My father has always taught me that you can never be wrong doing the right thing. I live my life by this and encourage others to as well.ReferencesBroad, C. (1930). Five types of ethical theory. New York Harcourt, coupling and Co.Ciulla, J. (2004). Ethics, the heart of leadership. Connect icut Praeger.Ross, W. D. (2002). The right and the good. Oxford Clarendon Press.Wikipedia. (2008). Retrieved September 17, 2008 from http//www.wikipedia.org